It
happened twice during a conference on "moral education in a diverse society" many years ago; it happens every time I wear that necklace. It’s a necklace I love and have had for
thirty-plus years. And yet each time I wear this necklace it brings me to the
question of race.
Back
in the 1970s, living in Manhattan, walking down Third Avenue as I’d done
thousands of times, I saw a young man seated at a small table with about twenty
pieces of silver jewelry. Sidewalk
vendors were an every weekend occurrence in Manhattan at least throughout the
spring, summer, and fall. It was the
way-of-shopping life and how I bought most of what I owned. I stopped and looked, as I’d done over and
over again every other Saturday in the city at the 26th Street Flea Market, at the Lexington Avenue Fair,
at Union Square. A discriminating shopper (and not one to
easily part with my money) one lovely piece caught my eye — a simple silver rectangular face; an inch
wide, eighth-of-an inch longer. A kind of molded impression of a face — nose,
mouth and concave depressions for the eyes — a truly simple, yet haunting piece
I felt I had to have.
“This
is beautiful,” I said to the twenty-something guy behind the table, looking carefully at the piece. “Did you
make it?”
He
replied yes and seemed glad I was interested. “It’s silver,” he said trying to be helpful, “see, it’s marked on
the back.” I turned it over to see the 925 and two simple vertical loops on
the other side. “You can wear it as a
pin or put it on a chain as a necklace,” he added hoping to cinch the sale.
“I’ll
take it,” I said, as I dug around in my over-sized bag to find the cash to pay
him. I honestly don’t remember how much
it cost; it’s been thirty years, but knowing me, I wouldn’t have paid more than
eleven or fourteen dollars for it.
“It’s
not signed.” I said to him startled that I just realized it.
“You didn’t sign your name on the back.”
He
looked at me uncomfortably.
“You know if you’re going to make things as
beautiful as this, you really should sign them," I said a bit emphatically, "even if you put just your
initials, you really need to, because this is a work of art,” I said hoping to impress upon him the importance of what I was saying.
As
I prattled on, he seemed to grow more and more uncomfortable and I took the
rectangle that he’d wrapped and taped in a tissue, and dropped it in my
bag. I said thanks and walked away, but
I wanted to go back and ask him his name. Ask him so I’d remember years later
(when he became famous) or if someone asked, I’d be able to say, “________ made
it.” But I didn’t.
I
didn’t because he was African-American and I sensed that asking him, he might
think that I thought he wasn’t really the artist; that I was questioning if
these pieces were really his. He hadn’t
offered his name. I had asked many a
struggling artist their name when buying an etching, watercolor, or handmade scarf on the
street. This time, because he was black,
I didn’t.
My
sister gave me a box-link silver chain that suited the face perfectly. I wore
it constantly and every time I did, someone, and often more than one someone,
complimented me on the necklace.
Photo: Jack Edinger |
However,
whenever someone African-American would notice my necklace and tell me how much
they liked it, then I had a problem. I
pretty much told them the story in the same way, of how I spotted it, purchased
it and didn't know the artist’s name, but I didn’t mention that he was African-American. I wanted to; I wanted to say,
“See this thing of absolute beauty was made by a black artist…but I didn't, because I didn't know how it would be heard.
Would the person be offended?
Would they think, “God isn't she racist?
She wouldn't tell me if the artist was white.” (And that was true.) Or would they be pleased
that they might share a sense of identity with the individual who had created
this lovely thing? I didn't know. But each time it happened it bothered
me.
Bothered
me all around.
Bothered
me that my assumptions about his identity originally stopped me from asking his
name.
Bothered
me that my perceptions of how to bridge the racial divide “colored” my
description of the maker.
Thoroughly
bothered me that my insecurities about whether or not I would be thought of as
racist caused me to react differently depending on whether the admirer was a
person of color or not.
Perhaps
my discomfort was that I initially censored myself because of some assumption
about racial identity and that left
me feeling guilty. Perhaps it was shame at not
getting his name or of having bought his piece of art on the street, assuming
it would help pay the rent. But the bottom line was that I didn’t know his name
and I could never truly credit him the way I did with so many other pieces of
my pottery, jewelry, and art collected over the years. It was race and it was racist and yet what
was the right thing to do? Be
color-blind about the maker?
Perhaps.
The
conference ended with the session, “What
Difference Does Race Make?” and before I got to that session, twice my necklace
had been admired, both times by men who were black. I still didn’t know what I should have
said.
I
wish I had asked.
OK, I think you're over-thinking this a bit. So now I will.
ReplyDeleteHe didn't sign the piece, he didn't offer his name. Many artists are humble in this way. But you thought it was because he didn't make it, maybe.
Whatever the real truth, what rankles you to this day is that you didn't pursue it with him; ask your questions. That has become the most damning evidence of all (of your racism).
Not wanting to offend becomes the larger offense, evidence that you consider his 'otherness' too great to risk real communication.
Well, all of us are a little bit racist (to quote from 'Avenue Q') but your
awareness is the antidote. It's unfortunate, though, that the least racist among us are the ones most tortured by the evidence.